The idea of cutting earmarks is not new. Ron Paul stated he would VETO any bill that had earmarks or was the least bit unconstitutional. The president has little control over the contents of the bill in front of him but if he runs a VETO on everyone that has an earmark it will dramatically cut spending because not many will survie a veto and have enough support to override it. www.myspace.com/familyrights

> Anyone notice this in the debate? The backdrop for both > candidates was this quote from the Declaration of > Independence: > > > “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their > just powers from > the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of > Government > becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the > People to > alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government” > > How appropriate. Go back and look for yourself.