The article you have requested is older than 7 days. Please register to view this article. If you have already registered, login.
Last updated on May 28 at 4:55 pm
- Other stories by Steve Begnoche:
- Badger returns to Ludington
- Buses arrive, begin trek to Ludington with carferry passengers
- Badger opening day woes
- Fish biology class offered at WSCC
- Audience praises 'Mickey Matson'
Related Stories:
How to contact federal lawmakers
Carferry has mechanical problems
Hoekstra supports grant for Badger
Today in LDN History
- Science students race cardboard boats
- Locals second, third in holiday tourney
- Christopher Vicars-Kimberly Mortensen
- Kelly Smith-Kristen Asiala
- Julie Companion-Ryan Ohse
Reader Comments
Please, no posting of links or URLs in the comment area. This area is for your commentary, links will be deleted from posts. Comments are moderated on a daily basis.This story is absolutely humorous in that it is so full of political pandering by Ms. Stabenow and Mr. Huizenga. The permit to continue operating just means keep burning coal. A common sense solution just means keep burning coal. The bottom line answer is votes in an election year. The real answer is to use natural gas or diesel. That costs money, which is not what the owners want to do. It is far cheaper to just make political donations at the right time.
Either keep the lake clean, or stay off it! If the Badger owner doesn't want to upgrade, he should just go away. The Muskegon ferry is much better anyway.
Let's have the Badger run on batteries that are charged by the wind turbines we should have up by the end of the year, LOL. The new president to be should just have the EPA grandfather the SS Badger in, or the Badger should begin to look for coal ash dumps in MI or WI they can use.





Stories Commented Recently:- Carferry files for EPA permit more than a month early
- Bicyclist injured in Manistee
- Brett Lee Moore
- Soccer and swimming results